In short
On 28 September 2026, 97.06 lakh of the 125.31 lakh houses sanctioned under PMAY-U and PMAY-U 2.0 were completed (77.5%), and 96% of completed houses were occupied. Among states and union territories with at least 1 lakh houses sanctioned, completion ranges from 41.9% in Bihar to 90.9% in Kerala. 2,51,347 houses sanctioned under the first PMAY-U were never started, 27.8% of all sanctions in Haryana.
State by state
| State / UT | Sanctioned | Completed | % of sanctioned | % of grounded | Occupied, % of completed | Never started (PMAY-U) | PMAY-U 2.0 yet to start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goa | 3,183 | 3,183 | 100% | 100% | 99.8% | 0 0% | 0 0% |
| Chandigarh | 1,287 | 1,287 | 100% | 100% | 99.8% | 0 0% | 0 0% |
| Delhi | 34,016 | 34,016 | 100% | 100% | 98.8% | 0 0% | 0 0% |
| DNH & DD | 10,823 | 10,581 | 97.8% | 97.8% | 97.6% | 0 0% | 0 0% |
| Tripura | 91,898 | 84,111 | 91.5% | 94.7% | 100% | 0 0% | 3,114 3.4% |
| Kerala | 1,58,780 | 1,44,264 | 90.9% | 93.2% | 99.9% | 9,451 6% | 0 0% |
| Tamil Nadu | 7,00,354 | 6,35,177 | 90.7% | 93.7% | 93.3% | 814 0.1% | 23,694 3.4% |
| A&N Island | 261 | 234 | 89.7% | 89.7% | 20.5% | 0 0% | 0 0% |
| Ladakh | 1,138 | 1,016 | 89.3% | 93.7% | 100% | 0 0% | 54 4.7% |
| Madhya Pradesh | 10,49,955 | 9,16,429 | 87.3% | 91.4% | 98.7% | 9,139 0.9% | 47,060 4.5% |
| Himachal Pradesh | 14,043 | 12,217 | 87% | 90.1% | 99.8% | 0 0% | 483 3.4% |
| West Bengal | 6,27,885 | 5,46,001 | 87% | 89.2% | 99.7% | 27,177 4.3% | 6,748 1.1% |
| Gujarat | 11,73,053 | 10,17,230 | 86.7% | 96.3% | 95.8% | 2,703 0.2% | 1,17,205 10% |
| Mizoram | 40,705 | 34,712 | 85.3% | 85.9% | 100% | 3,230 7.9% | 277 0.7% |
| J&K | 43,582 | 36,089 | 82.8% | 87.1% | 100% | 29 0.1% | 2,129 4.9% |
| Uttarakhand | 68,901 | 56,877 | 82.5% | 85.9% | 80.1% | 3,242 4.7% | 1,915 2.8% |
| Nagaland | 37,223 | 30,246 | 81.3% | 84.4% | 99.9% | 81 0.2% | 1,368 3.7% |
| Karnataka | 5,07,965 | 4,06,893 | 80.1% | 82.9% | 88.8% | 19,110 3.8% | 0 0% |
| Uttar Pradesh | 21,82,652 | 17,31,873 | 79.3% | 82.3% | 97.9% | 18,292 0.8% | 75,059 3.4% |
| Maharashtra | 14,04,013 | 11,02,917 | 78.6% | 89.9% | 94.1% | 20,478 1.5% | 1,72,546 12.3% |
| Chhattisgarh | 3,53,651 | 2,77,006 | 78.3% | 88.4% | 95.6% | 462 0.1% | 40,148 11.4% |
| Puducherry | 17,934 | 13,607 | 75.9% | 77.2% | 99.9% | 0 0% | 319 1.8% |
| Odisha | 2,38,117 | 1,79,279 | 75.3% | 88.3% | 97.6% | 21,409 9% | 17,943 7.5% |
| Rajasthan | 3,81,939 | 2,85,608 | 74.8% | 82.6% | 97.4% | 0 0% | 36,036 9.4% |
| Sikkim | 301 | 220 | 73.1% | 73.1% | 100% | 67 22.3% | 0 0% |
| Andhra Pradesh | 16,07,629 | 11,46,350 | 71.3% | 72.3% | 94.5% | 0 0% | 21,147 1.3% |
| Punjab | 1,59,230 | 1,08,640 | 68.2% | 78.6% | 99.3% | 6,808 4.3% | 18,579 11.7% |
| Assam | 2,26,889 | 1,50,467 | 66.3% | 81.5% | 100% | 8,549 3.8% | 42,158 18.6% |
| Jharkhand | 2,61,516 | 1,71,718 | 65.7% | 82.3% | 98.2% | 17,599 6.7% | 35,337 13.5% |
| Telangana | 4,00,505 | 2,42,549 | 60.6% | 87.5% | 83.6% | 0 0% | 1,23,150 30.7% |
| Haryana | 1,36,316 | 74,945 | 55% | 84.6% | 99.7% | 37,916 27.8% | 19,052 14% |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 21,387 | 10,441 | 48.8% | 70.1% | 88.4% | 0 0% | 6,490 30.3% |
| Bihar | 5,02,846 | 2,10,533 | 41.9% | 49.3% | 100% | 39,586 7.9% | 80,012 15.9% |
| Manipur | 61,949 | 25,611 | 41.3% | 48.5% | 100% | 4,111 6.6% | 6,249 10.1% |
| Meghalaya | 8,692 | 3,190 | 36.7% | 63% | 100% | 1,094 12.6% | 2,990 34.4% |
| All 35 | 1,25,30,618 | 97,05,517 | 77.5% | 84.2% | 96% | 2,51,347 | 9,01,262 |
“Grounded”: houses geotagged as started, the ministry's “GeoTagged/Grounded” column. “Never started (PMAY-U)”: the ministry's “Not Started (PMAY-U)” column, houses sanctioned under the first scheme. “Yet to start (PMAY-U 2.0)”: houses sanctioned under the second scheme, which runs from 1 September 2024, not started yet. Totals here add up the state and union territory rows, which match the printed sub-totals (checked by Payotte); the ministry's grand total also counts houses of the earlier JnNURM mission.
How Payotte computed it
Every count is the one printed in the ministry's table; Payotte only divides. “% of sanctioned” is the table's own completion rate. “% of grounded” divides completed houses by houses geotagged as started, which removes houses that never began. The sums of the state rows were checked against the three sub-totals printed in the table (states, north-eastern states, union territories).
Questions
How many PMAY-U houses have been completed?
97,05,517 houses out of 1,25,30,618 sanctioned, adding up the state and union territory rows of the ministry's table as on 28 September 2026. The table's printed grand total is higher because, as its footnote says, it also counts houses of the earlier JnNURM mission.
Why is the completion rate low in some states?
Two reasons show in the table: houses sanctioned under PMAY-U 2.0 that have not started yet (9,01,262 in all, 7.2% of sanctions), and houses of the first PMAY-U that were never started (2,51,347). The column “completed ÷ grounded” leaves both out.
Which state has the most houses sanctioned?
Uttar Pradesh: 21,82,652 houses sanctioned, 17,31,873 completed (79.3%).
General information drawn from the official sources cited and dated on this page. It is not legal, tax or financial advice: for your own situation, ask a licensed professional.